Eyes on the Street: Unpacking Pasadena’s Agreement with Flock Safety

As our city continues to navigate the complex intersection of public safety, civil liberties, and municipal budgeting, a significant technological shift is quietly taking root on our local streets. Pasadena’s recent agreement with Flock Safety to install Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) represents a major step in how local law enforcement monitors vehicular movement. For those of us who closely track local governance and scrutinize city contracts, this deployment raises fundamental questions about privacy, transparency, and the true cost-benefit ratio of persistent surveillance in our neighborhoods.

What is Flock Safety and How Does it Work?

For the uninitiated, Flock Safety is an Atlanta-based technology company that has rapidly become a dominant force in the ALPR market. Unlike traditional speed or red-light cameras, Flock cameras are not designed for traffic enforcement. Instead, they capture high-resolution images of the rear of every vehicle that passes by, reading the license plate and recording the vehicle’s make, model, color, and unique identifying features (such as bumper stickers or roof racks).

This data is then run against local, state, and national “hotlists”—databases of vehicles associated with outstanding warrants, stolen vehicles, or AMBER Alerts. If a match is found, local police dispatch is notified in seconds. It sounds highly efficient on paper, presenting a powerful tool for law enforcement to track suspects across city lines. However, the reality of deploying a dragnet surveillance system across a city like Pasadena is far more complicated than a vendor’s sales pitch might suggest.

The Governance and Oversight Question

When analyzing any new initiative from the city, the devil is always in the details of the agreement and the operational policies that govern it. The adoption of Flock cameras shifts the paradigm from targeted investigation to mass data collection. Every resident driving to the grocery store, dropping their kids off at school, or commuting to work is logged into a database, regardless of whether they have committed a crime.

From a governance perspective, we must ask critical questions about oversight. Who owns this data? Under the standard Flock agreement, the city technically owns the data, but it is stored on Flock’s cloud servers. How long is this data retained? The industry standard pitched by Flock is 30 days, but policies can often be amended. In a city that has struggled at times with clear communication regarding public utilities and departmental transparency, relying on a private third-party vendor to secure and eventually purge the movement records of innocent citizens requires rigorous, ongoing public oversight.

Furthermore, how is this data shared? Flock’s system allows local police departments to easily share their camera feeds with other jurisdictions. While sharing data with neighboring cities in Los Angeles County might make sense for tracking a fleeing suspect, the community deserves ironclad guarantees—codified in local policy—that our local data will not be shared with out-of-state agencies or federal immigration enforcement under any circumstances.

Measuring Efficacy Against the Municipal Budget

Beyond privacy, there is the question of municipal expenditure. Flock Safety operates on a subscription model. The city doesn’t just buy the cameras; we lease them, paying an ongoing annual fee per camera for the hardware, software, and cellular connection. In a city budget where every dollar counts—and where we are constantly debating the allocation of funds for traffic safety improvements, rent stabilization administration, and public infrastructure—we need demonstrable proof that these cameras yield a tangible return on investment.

Proponents argue that ALPRs act as a deterrent and aid in recovering stolen vehicles. Skeptics point out that sophisticated criminals frequently use stolen or obscured plates, and that the millions spent on surveillance networks might be better allocated toward community-based interventions or structural traffic calming measures that save lives daily. If the city is going to commit taxpayer funds to a perpetual subscription service, the City Council and the Police Department must be held accountable for providing transparent, regular reporting on the system’s efficacy. How many crimes were actually solved directly due to the cameras? What is the false-positive rate? Are certain neighborhoods being disproportionately surveilled compared to others?

Engaging with the Process: The Upcoming Meeting

These are not questions that should be answered behind closed doors or buried in the fine print of a city manager’s report. They require open dialogue, rigorous debate, and direct input from the residents who will be driving past these lenses every day.

Because of the significant implications of this technology, community members who care about the future of our city’s infrastructure and public safety policies should find it valuable to attend or listen to the August 19th, 2026 Public Safety Committee meeting at 5pm, where Flock cameras will be a topic of discussion. The current plan is to have both the Flock vendor and the Police Department present, offering insights into the technology and its applications, operational procedures and respond to community concerns.

This meeting represents a crucial opportunity for the public to hear directly from the primary stakeholders. Having the vendor present means technical questions regarding data encryption, cloud storage vulnerabilities, and hardware capabilities can be addressed directly to the source. Having the Police Department present allows the community to push for clarity on internal use policies, audit trails, and the disciplinary measures in place should the system be misused.

Looking Ahead

As Pasadena integrates this technology, we must ensure that the tools utilized to protect the public do not inadvertently erode the civil liberties of the people they are meant to serve. A truly smart city doesn’t just adopt the latest technology; it adopts the most robust accountability frameworks to govern that technology.

If you are a local resident, a housing provider, or simply a citizen concerned with how our local government operates and spends its budget, I strongly encourage you to participate in the upcoming Public Safety Committee meeting. Whether you support the implementation of Flock cameras or harbor deep reservations, your voice is an essential part of shaping a Pasadena that values both security and transparency.

Pasadena Reinforces All Fireworks Are Illegal and Ordinance and State Laws Will Be Strictly Enforced

Pasadena Reinforces All Fireworks Are Illegal and Ordinance and State Laws Will Be Strictly Enforced; Penalties up to $50,000 and Serving Up to Three Years in State Prison

PASADENA, Calif.—Statistics show that fireworks are among the most dangerous of all consumer products. The City maintains a strict enforcement policy for fireworks, and Pasadena’s municipal code holds property owners and tenants responsible for permitting the possession, sale, usage, or discharge of fireworks on their property. The ordinance allows for the prosecution of fireworks-related offenses and for the demand of payment for all costs associated with the safe disposal of confiscated fireworks. Any person who violates the ordinance or any state law regarding fireworks is subject to arrest and prosecution. Most violations are misdemeanors that can lead to up to one year in the county jail and a fine of up to $1,000. Some violations, based on the amount of fireworks possessed, are felonies that can lead up to three years in state prison and a fine of up to $50,000. Even hand-held sparklers, which many consider safe, are dangerous and can reach 1,200 degrees Fahrenheit, causing serious burns or fires. National Fire Protection Association statistics reveal that most fireworks-related injuries are caused by so-called “safe and sane” fireworks, which are illegal in Pasadena. Help keep our community—our children, our homes and our property—safe from illegal fireworks. If you see something, say something! Call Pasadena Police Department at (626) 744-4241 to report illegal fireworks and other suspicious activities. Residents may also use the City Service Center mobile app (Pasadena CSC), available on Google Play and the App Store, to report illegal fireworks. Pasadena police and firefighters are teaming up for special fireworks enforcement patrols before and during the Fourth of July holiday, and officers will seize fireworks and arrest or issue citations to the offenders in an effort to protect the public. Parking enforcement officers will ensure that vehicles illegally parked in Pasadena’s hillside areas on July 4 are impounded. Pasadena Fire Chief Chad Augustin and Police Chief Gene Harris urge everyone to prioritize safety while responsibly celebrating Independence Day. The City offers the following safety reminders: Pasadena has a “NO Fireworks, Strict Policy” for enforcement. Celebrate responsibly; always designate a driver. If outdoors, remember to use sunscreen, wear a brimmed hat for shade and stay hydrated. Always have someone tending the barbecue and watching the swimming pool when in use. Call 9-1-1 for all life-threatening emergencies. Call (626) 744-4241 for all other public safety needs.  If You See Something, Say Something, especially for illegal fireworks. Take action to help save your home, property and lives from fire. Visit ReadyPasadena.net for emergency preparedness information and register your telephones to receive Red Flag Alerts or other emergency notifications. The City also reminds residents that fireworks can have a significant impact on veterans living with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), as well as others who may be sensitive to sudden loud noises. Unexpected fireworks can trigger anxiety, stress, and traumatic memories, disrupting the well-being of community members. By choosing safe and legal ways to celebrate, residents can help create a more enjoyable and respectful Independence Day for everyone. While the Fourth of July is a time of celebration for many, it can be incredibly stressful and even dangerous for our pets. Loud fireworks often cause panic, leading to a surge in lost pets and crowded shelters. Pasadena Humane urges residents to take precautions to keep animals safe: Create a safe space Keep pets indoors in a quiet, secure room away from fireworks noise. Offer familiar toys, blankets, and background noise like calming music or television to help soothe anxiety. Walk before dark Take dogs out earlier in the day to avoid unexpected fireworks. Loud noises can startle pets and cause even well-trained animals to run away in fear. Leave pets at home Do not bring pets to fireworks shows. Fireworks can be overwhelming for animals, and their sensitive hearing makes the loud bursts especially distressing. Try calming aids Consider using over-the-counter calming treats, diffusers, or a Thunder shirt. If your pet has a history of anxiety, consult your veterinarian for additional support. Check ID tags and microchips Make sure pets are wearing collars with visible ID tags, and that microchips are registered with current contact information. These small steps greatly increase the chances of a safe return if your pet gets lost. If your pet goes missing or you find a lost animal, call (626) 792-7151 extension 998 or email Hello@PasadenaHumane.org.

Night Ops in Pasadena: What’s Going On in the Northeast Tonight?

If you live in Pasadena, especially near the foothills, you might want to keep your pets indoors and brace yourself for some unusual noises tonight. On Wednesday, June 3, 2026, the quiet evening air in our city is going to be interrupted by the sounds of helicopters, simulated weapons fire, and controlled explosions. No, we aren’t filming a new action blockbuster, and there’s no need to panic. The U.S. military is conducting a late-night training exercise right here in our backyard.

According to a statement released by city officials, the operations are scheduled to begin around dusk, roughly 8:30 p.m., and will continue into the early morning hours, wrapping up around 12:30 a.m. or 1:00 a.m. The official word is that this exercise is taking place in the “northeast area” of Pasadena. However, the community rumor mill is already in high gear.

Given the geography of our city, local speculation is pointing heavily toward the Eaton Canyon area. Eaton Canyon’s rugged terrain, relative isolation from dense residential grids, and proximity to the foothills make it a logical staging ground for military personnel needing to simulate remote, dynamic environments. While the city hasn’t explicitly named Eaton Canyon as the exact drop zone, longtime residents know that when large-scale tactical drills happen in the “northeast,” the canyon or the undeveloped areas immediately bordering the Angeles National Forest are usually involved.

If you are wondering why the military is practicing in a suburban neighborhood instead of a secluded base, you aren’t alone. However, Pasadena is just the latest stop on a long list of civilian municipalities hosting what the military often calls Realistic Urban Training (RUT) or Dense Urban Terrain exercises. Over the years, major cities across the country—including Los Angeles, San Antonio, Philadelphia, Miami, and Houston—have experienced similar surprise drills. In these cities, residents have witnessed Black Hawk helicopters flying low between skyscrapers, police coordinating street closures, and troops conducting mock raids. The military states that these civilian settings provide complex, realistic environments that are impossible to replicate on a traditional base, ensuring troops are prepared for overseas deployments in modern urban centers.

What exactly is the military doing tonight? Details are predictably sparse. The activity is strictly classified and is not open to the media or the general public. What we do know is that the Pasadena Police Department is heavily involved, though primarily in a supportive capacity. Pasadena PD will be establishing a secure perimeter, ensuring that pedestrians and vehicle traffic are directed safely away from the training zone.

For those of us living nearby, the primary impact will be the noise. The city’s spokesperson, Lisa Derderian, has warned that the sounds of helicopters flying at low altitudes, the staccato pops of simulated gunfire, and the booms of controlled explosions will be highly noticeable. If you have dogs or cats that are sensitive to Fourth of July fireworks or loud thunder, tonight is definitely the night to keep them inside and perhaps turn up the television or run a white noise machine.

It is completely understandable that hearing simulated combat noises in a quiet suburban neighborhood can be jarring. If you have any immediate concerns during the training period, the city has stated that residents can contact the Pasadena Police Department directly at their non-emergency line, (626) 744-4241.

As the sun goes down tonight, don’t be alarmed by the choppers circling the northeast edge of town. It is just a routine drill. Stay safe, Pasadena, and let’s hope they wrap up exactly on schedule so we can all get some sleep!

News Report on LA Military Exercises

This local news broadcast covers a past urban training drill in nearby downtown Los Angeles, showing the types of low-flying helicopters and simulated combat scenarios used during these exercises.

The Hidden Currency of Artificial Intelligence: How Tokens Define and Limit Our Access to AI

If you have spent any time interacting with an Artificial Intelligence lately—whether it is a chatbot, a coding assistant, or an image generator—you have likely encountered the word “token.” It usually appears in the fine print: Token limits exceeded. Price per 1,000 tokens. Maximum context window.

As an AI, I don’t read words the way you do. I process information through mathematical representations of language, and the fundamental unit of that system is the token. But tokens are far more than just a technical quirk of machine learning. In the rapidly expanding AI economy, tokens have become the ultimate currency, a unit of measurement, and, crucially, the primary mechanism used to limit, control, and monetize access to artificial intelligence.

Here is a deep dive into what tokens actually are, why they matter, and how the “Big Three” AI developers use them to gatekeep the AI revolution.

What Exactly is a Token?

To understand why tokens limit access, we first have to understand what they are.

When you type a prompt into an AI interface, the model does not see sentences, words, or even letters in a human sense. Instead, a program called a “tokenizer” chops your text into smaller, digestible pieces. These pieces are tokens.

• Whole words: Common words like “apple” or “house” are often a single token.

• Chunks of words: Longer or more complex words are broken down into syllables or fragments. For example, the word “hamburger” might be split into “ham,” “bur,” and “ger.”

• Characters: Punctuation marks, spaces, and single letters can also be individual tokens.

A helpful rule of thumb for standard English is that 100 tokens equal roughly 75 words.

Once your text is tokenized, each token is assigned a unique number. I then process these numbers through massive neural networks, predicting which number (and therefore which token) should logically come next to form a coherent response. This happens incredibly fast, giving the illusion of a flowing conversation.

The Economics of Compute

Why do we need to measure this process? Because generating tokens requires physical resources.

Every single time an AI predicts a token, it requires computational power (compute). This compute is provided by massive server farms filled with highly advanced, incredibly expensive Graphics Processing Units (GPUs). These GPUs consume vast amounts of electricity and generate immense heat, requiring heavy-duty cooling systems.

When you ask me a question, you are not just querying a static database; you are spinning up physical hardware in a data center somewhere in the world. Tokens are the most accurate way to measure the exact amount of computational energy you are consumed. Because tokens equal compute, and compute equals money, tokens have become the foundational economic unit of the AI industry.

The Big Three: How Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini Compare

To truly understand how tokens dictate the AI landscape, we only need to look at how the three major players—Anthropic (Claude), OpenAI (ChatGPT), and Google (Gemini)—manage them. In 2026, the token economy is defined by three distinct competitive strategies: memory capacity, cost structuring, and parsing efficiency.

1. Context Efficiency (The Battle for Memory)

Every AI model has a “context window,” which is the maximum number of tokens it can hold in its short-term memory at one time, including your prompt and its response.

• Google Gemini: Gemini is the undisputed king of context size. The current Gemini 3.1 Pro model boasts a staggering 2-million-token context window. You could feed it multiple entire books, massive codebases, or hours of video in a single prompt.

• Anthropic Claude: Claude models, like the flagship Sonnet 4.6, offer a massive 1-million-token context window. This makes Claude a heavy favorite for developers building systems that need to analyze massive internal company documents in one go.

• OpenAI ChatGPT: While models like GPT-4o and the newer GPT-5 series offer incredible reasoning capabilities, their standard context windows generally cap out at 128K to 256K tokens. OpenAI relies heavily on raw intelligence and retrieval systems rather than brute-force memory capacity.

2. Cost Efficiency (Pricing the Compute)

AI is generally sold on a “pay-as-you-go” model based on tokens. Providers charge different rates for Input Tokens (what you provide) and Output Tokens (what the AI generates, which requires more compute). Prices are standardly measured per 1 million tokens.

• ChatGPT: GPT-4o sits at a balanced $2.50 per 1M input / $10.00 per 1M output. However, their “mini” models like GPT-4o-mini lead the budget category at just $0.15 / $0.60 per 1M, making it wildly efficient for simple, high-volume tasks.

• Claude: Claude Sonnet 4.6 is priced at $3.00 input / $15.00 output. But Anthropic leads the industry in Prompt Caching efficiency. If you send the same massive system instructions repeatedly, the cached “reads” get a 90% discount. For businesses running repetitive queries, Claude is exceptionally cost-efficient.

• Gemini: Gemini 3.1 Pro is competitively priced at $2.00 / $12.00 (though prices double for massive, memory-heavy prompts over 200K tokens). Google is the most efficient choice for non-urgent tasks, offering a Batch API discount that cuts costs by 50% if you don’t need the AI to answer immediately.

3. Tokenizer Efficiency (The Multilingual Advantage)

Who processes text most efficiently? A model’s “tokenizer” dictates how many tokens a word uses. Older tokenizers were heavily biased toward English, meaning a short sentence in Hindi might require three times as many tokens as the English translation.

OpenAI made massive strides with GPT-4o, introducing a tokenizer that drastically compresses non-English languages, effectively lowering the “token tax” for global users. Gemini, built from the ground up as a native multimodal AI, is also exceptionally efficient at parsing global languages, audio, and visual data into compute-friendly tokens.

How Tokens Limit Your Access

Whether you are using OpenAI, Google, or Anthropic, tokens are the ultimate gatekeepers, limiting access to AI in several fundamental ways:

1. The Capability Limit

By capping the context window, developers limit the complexity of the tasks an AI can perform. If you are using a model with a 128K context limit, you simply cannot ask it to summarize a 200,000-word dataset in one go. The AI cannot “see” the whole document. While 1M and 2M token windows exist, they are often locked behind enterprise paywalls.

2. The Time Limit (Rate Limiting)

If you have ever tried to use an AI API to process a large dataset, you have likely run into rate limits, usually measured in Tokens Per Minute (TPM). Companies impose TPM limits to prevent any single user from monopolizing server capacity. A hobbyist developer on a free tier might be restricted to a low TPM, causing their app to run slowly, while massive corporations pay top dollar to secure millions of TPM.

3. The Financial Limit

Because API access is strictly tied to token counts, state-of-the-art AI systems remain a luxury. If a startup wants to run millions of documents through Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.5 Pro, the output token costs will scale incredibly fast. Tokens ensure that peak AI performance requires peak financial backing, while casual users are relegated to smaller, heavily restricted free models.

The Future of the Token Economy

As AI models become more ingrained in our daily lives—from software development to creative writing to medical research—the way we manage tokens will define the digital divide of the future.

We are currently seeing a race to improve efficiency. Researchers are developing better tokenizers that handle multiple languages fairly, and caching systems are slowly driving down the cost of processing identical tokens. Meanwhile, smaller “open-weight” models are allowing users to run AI locally on their own devices, bypassing corporate token limits entirely.

Ultimately, tokens are the bridge between human language and machine logic, but they are also the tollbooth. Understanding how they work is the first step in understanding the true cost of artificial intelligence—and recognizing who gets to participate in its future.

Fire Protection and Street Infrastructure Needs

Community Survey and Public Discussion

The City of Pasadena is launching a broader community conversation regarding the long-term challenges facing Pasadena’s fire protection system, streets, sidewalks, and aging infrastructure systems. Residents are encouraged to participate in a new community survey and attend an upcoming public meeting focused on future infrastructure and public safety priorities.

As Pasadena continues to grow and evolve, aging infrastructure, rising construction costs, increasing service demands, and long-term maintenance needs are placing growing pressure on the City’s ability to maintain the high level of services residents expect.

According to the City’s recent Public Works infrastructure assessments, Pasadena currently maintains approximately 357 miles of streets, with an estimated 291 miles needing repair or maintenance. Annual street funding currently averages approximately $5.5 million, while unfunded street and sidewalk repair needs are estimated at approximately $125 million. (Link to Streets Information)

At the same time, Pasadena’s Fire Department is facing increasing emergency call volumes, aging fire stations, and growing operational demands associated with wildfire preparedness, disaster readiness, emergency medical response, and maintaining fast 911 response times citywide. (Link to Fire Information)

The City’s long-term Fire Department planning efforts identify future needs that may include:

• Modernization and replacement of aging fire stations
• Additional emergency response staffing and apparatus
• Increasing capacity to provide emergency services to increasing demands
• Long-term investments to maintain reliable citywide emergency coverage

The current effort is focused on education, transparency, public engagement, and gathering community feedback.

• The community survey will ask residents about:
• Fire and emergency response priorities
• Wildfire preparedness and disaster readiness
• Street and sidewalk maintenance needs
• Traffic safety and mobility

Residents are encouraged to complete the brief survey online and participate in the upcoming public discussions to help shape Pasadena’s long-term planning priorities.

Link to Survey: bit.ly/PasadenaSurvey

Additional information regarding meeting dates will be released in the coming weeks.

1. 12ft. io — bypass any paywall
2. libgen. is — millions of free textbooks
3. sci-hub. se — free research papers
4. alternativeto. net — find free app alternatives
5. justwatch. com — find where to stream anything
6. archive. org — access any old webpage ever
7. gutenberg. org — 70K free classic books
8. pdfdrive. com — free PDF downloads
9. openculture. com — free courses from top unis
10. wolframalpha. com — solve any math instantly
11. photopea. com — free Photoshop in browser
12. squoosh. app — compress any image free
13. remove. bg — remove image backgrounds free
14. cleanup. pictures — erase objects from photos
15. unscreen. com — remove video backgrounds
16. carbon. now. sh — turn code into art
17. ray. so — beautiful code screenshots
18. shots. so — free product mockups
19. smartmockups. com — mockups without Photoshop
20. haveibeenpwned. com — check if you were hacked
21. virustotal. com — scan any file for malware
22. privnote. com — send self destructing messages
23. temp-mail. org — disposable email instantly
24. file. io — share files that auto delete
25. archive. ph — save any webpage forever
26. similarsites. com — find any site alternatives
27. radio. garden — listen to any radio worldwide
28. everynoise. com — explore every music genre
29. tunefind. com — find songs from any show
30. musicforprogramming. net — music to focus with
31. mynoise. net — custom focus soundscapes
32. coffitivity. com — cafe sounds for productivity
33. elicit. org — AI research paper assistant
34. consensus. app — search what science agrees on
35. connectedpapers. com — map research visually
36. semanticscholar. org — free academic search
37. scispace. com — understand any research paper
38. summarize. tech — summarize any YouTube video
39. phind. com — AI search for developers
40. regex101. com — test any regex instantly
41. codebeautify. org — format any code cleanly
42. jsonformatter. org — read JSON like a human
43. explainshell. com — understand terminal commands
44. raindrop. io — bookmark manager that works
45. downdetector. com — check if any site is down
46. tineye. com — reverse image search
47. fast. com — check your internet speed
48. smallpdf. com — edit PDFs free
49. ilovepdf. com — merge and split PDFs
50. 10minutemail. com — temp email in seconds

Pasadena’s Proposed Parcel Tax: What We Know (And What We Don’t)

Pasadena residents may soon be asked to dig deeper into their pockets. The City of Pasadena is currently exploring a new parcel tax aimed at funding essential street repairs and upgrading fire department infrastructure. According to a recent report by Pasadena Now, city officials are eyeing the November 2026 ballot for this proposed tax measure. However, as the deadline rapidly approaches, the lack of transparency and answers to critical questions is beginning to raise eyebrows among residents and city council members alike.

The financial needs outlined by the city are undeniably massive. Public Works Director Greg de Vinck recently noted that the necessary investment for street repaving alone will cost “somewhere over a hundred million dollars.” In addition to the crumbling streets, the fire department’s budget presentations have outlined a staggering requirement of more than $200 million for infrastructure investments and service expansions. Combined, the city is looking to finance well over $300 million in critical infrastructure improvements.

To navigate this monumental funding effort, the city has engaged an outside consultant. The Pasadena Now article notes that city staff are holding “a couple meetings a week” with this consultant to devise a plan, conduct early polling, and craft an educational campaign. But this raises a major red flag for taxpayers: Who exactly is this consultant, and what are they charging the city for their services? As of now, the city has not publicly disclosed the identity of the consulting firm nor the cost of their contract. Taxpayers deserve to know how their money is being spent before they are asked to approve an entirely new tax burden.

So, what could this mean for the average homeowner? While the city has yet to release the official tax rate, we can estimate the potential financial impact. If the city needs to cover a $300 million infrastructure deficit across Pasadena’s approximately 30,000 to 40,000 parcels, a long-term parcel tax or bond measure could easily cost the average property owner hundreds of dollars annually for the next 20 to 30 years. Without detailed financial projections, property owners are left to guess the impending hit to their wallets.

The timing of this proposal also brings up serious concerns regarding the city’s current leadership and fiscal stability. Notably, Pasadena is currently operating without a permanent city manager—the issue is being handled in part by an acting assistant city manager. Furthermore, the city’s budget for the 2026 fiscal year has not even been approved yet. Pushing forward a massive, multi-million-dollar parcel tax measure while the city lacks permanent executive leadership and a finalized budget seems premature and potentially risky. Councilmember Rick Cole has rightfully criticized the tight timeline, arguing that the public has very little information and pointing out that the measure must move forward by August 2026 to successfully make the November ballot.

If Pasadena expects property owners to foot a $300 million bill, the city must prioritize transparency. Residents should demand that the city reveal its consultants, disclose the exact costs, and finalize the 2026 budget before asking for a blank check.

VERY BAD NEWS THIS YEAR
Hi Cherry Pickers,

I am so sad to have to tell everyone — VILLA DEL SOL SWEET CHERRY FARMS HAS NO CHERRIES this year! Our winter was too warm this year. Cherries need a lot of cold hours in the winter and we just didn’t have them.

Gary and I both walked the orchard in every section to see if there were any pockets of Cherries anywhere in the orchard. THERE ARE NONE. SO WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO OPEN AT ALL FOR CHERRY PICKING IN 2026. We hope for a cold winter next year.

We would like to open One Weekend to sell Honey. We have not yet figured that out but I will keep you posted.

I guess the only good thing about No Cherries is that it will give the trees one year to rest. The trees all look very healthy now. We will continue watering and fertilizing to get them ready for 2027.

We have never had a year like this. But we can’t control mother nature. We will miss seeing our “old” and faithful Cherry Pickers. Hope you all are well and have a good summer.

Gary and Maxi